Libya’s Dams Collapse vs. Ghana’s Dams Spillage: The Lesser of Two Evils

Libya’s Dams Collapse vs. Ghana's Dams Spillage: The Lesser of Two Evils

The decision to release water from a dam, knowing full well the effects on local communities and the economy, is never an easy one for the management of any dam. Dams are typically constructed to withstand periods of severe weather. A dam’s design and construction account for all potential repercussions. But when a dam’s integrity is in jeopardy, even the smallest delay or action could be the difference between a localised problem and a global catastrophe.

Libya’s Dams’ Collapse: The Facts

VRA’s Dam Spillage: The Facts

Avoiding dam failure

A dam’s failure can be prevented. That is, if the dam operators open the gates to discharge the water in a sensible, “controlled” manner, according to Technical Researcher Philip Faley. To disregard a heavy downpour like that in Libya meant calamity was inevitable, and that was what officials in charge of the dam’s water management should have avoided. In Ghana, the VRA had planned to carry out the spill this October, but technical observations and meteorological warnings forced the Authority to do so in the middle of September. Delaying the spill for another day, according to the dam’s engineers, may have been disastrous.

Faley urges dam managers, the government, and key stakeholders to be directed by a dam’s design data to take measures to avoid any incident; they should also be aware of what to do in the event of a dam failure. The Volta River Authority, manager of both the Akosombo and Kpong Dams in Ghana, has an Emergency Preparedness Plan (EPP) in place to deal with crises like spills. This plan is a thorough guide that specifies the duties that will be expected of all pertinent individuals in the case of an emergency, and it is in line with this that the organisation conducted the ongoing spillage and its attendant evacuation exercises.

Moreover, other safety precautions concern housing and other construction projects. Technical Researcher Faley says poor planning was seen in the case of Libya. It was improper to build homes in the areas downstream from the dams. In the end, if the engineers on site had released the water from the reservoir as soon as the storm started, the disaster would have been avoided, or at the very least the damages might have been limited.

Protecting a Dam’s Integrity

Regardless of how they are built, dams contain safety features that allow water to be released during storms to prevent the maximum carrying capacity from being reached. Several researchers have identified foundation issues, inadequate spillways, subpar construction, and uneven settlement as the most common causes of dam breaches. To avert any dangers, a dam should have all its components examined as part of a routine inspection schedule by the managers. In Faley’s expert opinion, dam management was the challenge in the Libyan situation.

For the VRA, regular inspections on the Akosombo and Kpong Dams have resulted in several retrofits over the years, the most recent in 2016. It involved upgrading the dam’s electrical and control systems, replacing the dam’s turbines and generators, upgrading the dam’s spillway gates, and strengthening the dam’s concrete structure. This retrofit project improved the dam’s performance and extended its lifespan by 30–40 years.

In his assessment of Libya’s situation, Faley explains that the collapse of the dams would have resulted in less damage if the gates had been opened to keep water within the dam’s carrying capacity. In Ghana’s situation, however, the VRA exercised care and promptly opened the spill gates; even if the outcome is unpleasant, it could have been disastrous, considering what happened in Libya.

Source: Ghana News

Exit mobile version